Get Started with AI Evaluations

Project

Artificial Intelligence

Advanced

Use Template

This is a 'Project' template which means that it contains a group of workflows that work together to achieve a particular aim

AI Agent Evaluation Framework

Copy

Introduction

Copy

Evaluating AI agents and automations is crucial for ensuring reliable, consistent, and high-quality outputs in production environments. As AI systems become more integrated into business processes, robust evaluation frameworks help teams identify potential issues, maintain quality standards, and drive continuous improvement.

This documentation outlines an automated evaluation framework implemented in Tray.io that can serve as a foundation for testing AI agents and automations. The framework introduces the concept of "LLM as a Judge" - a systematic approach to automated evaluation of AI outputs.

Common Evaluation Types

Copy

Several evaluation approaches are commonly used to assess AI agent performance:

1. Response Quality Evaluation: Assesses whether the AI agent's responses meet predefined quality criteria such as accuracy, completeness, and relevance. This includes checking if the response appropriately addresses the user's query and contains all necessary information.

2. Conversation Flow Analysis: Evaluates how well the agent manages dialogue, including its ability to maintain context, provide appropriate follow-ups, and successfully conclude conversations. This is particularly important for ensuring natural, efficient interactions.

3. Edge Case Testing: Focuses on testing the agent's behavior in unusual or challenging scenarios, helping identify potential failure modes and robustness issues. This includes handling ambiguous queries, multiple intents, or incomplete information.

4. Behavioral Consistency: Examines whether the agent maintains consistent tone, style, and decision-making across different interactions and contexts. This ensures predictable and reliable behavior in production environments.

LLM as a Judge

Copy

"LLM as a Judge" refers to using a Large Language Model to systematically evaluate the outputs of another AI system. This approach offers several advantages:

1. Scalability: Enables automated evaluation of large numbers of test cases without requiring human review for each interaction

2. Consistency: Applies consistent evaluation criteria across all test cases

3. Objectivity: Reduces potential human bias in the evaluation process

4. Real-time Feedback: Provides immediate feedback that can be used for continuous improvement

In this framework, the judge LLM:

1. Reviews both the input prompt and the agent's response

2. Evaluates against specific criteria (e.g., conversation completion, response appropriateness)

3. Provides structured feedback in a consistent format

4. Generates quantitative metrics that can be tracked over time

The evaluation results can be used to:

1. Identify patterns in agent performance

2. Track improvement over time

3. Compare different versions of agents

4. Guide refinements to prompt engineering and agent behavior

This framework serves as a starting point for teams looking to implement systematic evaluation of their AI systems. It can be customized and extended based on specific use cases and requirements.