Skip to content

Compare

Tray.ai vs. Pipedream

Pipedream Workflows closes on 31 March 2027. Tray is a workflow platform you can move to and stay on

Great — a couple more details

This helps us connect you with the right person. Optional, and you can skip it.

All comparisons

Why enterprises choose Tray

CiscoAirbnbFedExNotionNetAppApollo.ioYextLife360

Side by side

Capability Tray.ai Pipedream
Product status
Workflow product open to new customers No. Workflows is in maintenance mode, closed to signups, shutting down 31 March 2027 (read 2026-10-08)
Ownership Tray.ai Workday, which closed the acquisition in its fiscal year ended 31 January 2026
Where the product is going Workflows, agents and MCP on one platform Connect, an integration layer developers build into their own agents and apps
Who can build
Business teams build without writing code Developer-first. Connect is an SDK and API
Engineers can drop to code Code steps, TypeScript CDK, Tray Headless
Deployment + operations
Fully managed, nothing to run
Execution uptime 99.99%+ execution uptime, track record No SLA on Free or Startup; priority SLA on Business (pipedream.com/pricing, read 2026-10-08)
Support Enterprise support in the contract Community on Free, email on Startup, dedicated Slack on Business (read 2026-10-08)
Governance + compliance
SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR Yes, on every plan (read 2026-10-08)
HIPAA, SSO, SCIM Business plan only
Governed MCP layer (Agent Gateway for MCP) Per-tool and per-user policy, every call logged, available today Conduit, an MCP gateway with access policies and an audit trail, in early access
AI + agents
Native no-code AI agent builder (Merlin) Connect supplies tools to agents you build elsewhere
Build workflows in natural language from Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf (Tray Headless) —
Connectors + scale
Connector library 700+ Tray-built connectors 3,000+ APIs and 10,000+ prebuilt tools (pipedream.com, read 2026-10-08)
Proven throughput 1T+ processes/year No comparable public figure

What you get instead

workflow execution uptime, trailing 90 days on status.tray.ai
100%
processes run per year on the platform
1T+
Type 2 audited, with annual penetration testing
SOC 1 & 2
managed connectors across integration, automation and agents
700+

The real difference

The biggest fact about Pipedream in October 2026 is one Pipedream published itself. Workflows and String are shutting down on 31 March 2027. Workflows is in maintenance mode, closed to new signups and subscriptions, with no new features coming, and all Workflows data, including stored credentials and OAuth tokens, will be deleted by 30 April 2027. We read that notice on 2026-10-08.

That follows the ownership change. Workday announced a deal to acquire Pipedream in November 2025 and reported it closed in its fiscal 2026 results. Pipedream now calls itself “the integration layer for AI agents” and is putting its effort into Connect: managed auth, MCP servers and more than 10,000 prebuilt tools that developers build into their own agents and apps.

So this is no longer a comparison of two workflow platforms. If you run workflows on Pipedream, the question is where they go before March 2027. If you are building agents, the question is whether you want a developer integration layer to call from your own code, or a platform where the workflows, the agents and the governance sit together. Tray.ai is the second.

Where Pipedream wins

Connect is good at what it does. Hosted MCP servers for more than 3,000 APIs, managed OAuth, each user’s credentials kept separate and never shown to the model, and SDKs in several languages. For a developer adding integrations to an agent product, it removes a lot of work.

The compliance basics are on every plan: Pipedream lists SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR on Free, Startup and Business, with HIPAA, SSO and SCIM on Business.

The meter is still a fair one. Pipedream charges compute, one credit per 30 seconds at 256MB, so a workflow with twelve trivial steps does not cost twelve times one with a single step.

And the shutdown notice itself is decent: six months’ runway, an export tool for workflow structure, and a prorated refund with nothing to do.

Where Tray.ai wins

  • It is still a workflow platform. Tray.ai is taking on workflows, not winding them down. Pipedream’s export gives you workflow structure as JSON, one project at a time; Tray Headless can rebuild workflows in natural language from Claude Code, Cursor or any MCP client, and they open in the visual builder afterwards.
  • Non-developers can build. Pipedream Connect is an SDK and an API. Tray.ai’s builders include the people who own the process, without taking code steps, the TypeScript CDK or Tray Headless away from engineers.
  • 700+ maintained connectors. Tray-built and Tray-maintained, including when the upstream API changes.
  • Governed agent access, generally available. Agent Gateway puts per-tool and per-user policy in front of MCP, with rate limiting and every call logged for audit. Pipedream’s equivalent, Conduit, is listed as early access.
  • One audit surface. Workflows, MCP and agents in a single audit trail and a single permission model.
  • Enterprise terms. SOC 1 & SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR, enterprise support in the contract and 99.99%+ execution uptime as a track record.

Pricing reality

Pipedream publishes its pricing and Tray.ai does not. That is a point against us.

Pipedream’s pricing page, read 2026-10-08, now covers Connect: free for development, Startup at $99 a month billed annually or $150 billed monthly with 10,000 credits and then $0.012 a credit, and a custom Business plan. Existing Workflows subscriptions run until 31 March 2027 and are then cancelled with a prorated refund.

If you are moving off Pipedream Workflows, the honest comparison is not Pipedream against Tray.ai. It is Tray.ai against whichever other platform you would move to, priced on the workflows you actually run.

The bottom line

Choose Tray.ai if

You are moving workflows off Pipedream before March 2027, business teams need to build alongside developers, and agent access needs a policy layer with an audit trail that is generally available today.

Choose Pipedream if

You are a developer building your own AI agent or app, and you want managed auth and thousands of prebuilt tools to call from your code rather than a workflow platform.

Pricing reality

Tray.ai

Enterprise / quote-based. One platform, one contract

Support, SLAs, governance and compliance are in the contract

Pipedream

Connect: Free for development, Startup $99/mo billed annually ($150 monthly) with 10,000 credits, Business custom. Workflows plans end 31 March 2027

Pipedream still meters compute: one credit per 30 seconds of compute at 256MB. Workflows subscriptions stay active until 31 March 2027, then end with a prorated refund.

Industry recognized

3× Visionary

Gartner Magic Quadrant for iPaaS, 2024, 2025 and 2026

7× Leader

Nucleus Research iPaaS Value Matrix, seven consecutive years

Pioneer

Gartner Emerging Market Quadrant for No-Code Agent Builders, 2026

14 Hype Cycles

Gartner inclusions in 2026, including Agentic AI and Agentic Automation

Frequently asked questions

Is Pipedream shutting down?

+

Pipedream Workflows and String are. Pipedream's own documentation says both will shut down on 31 March 2027, that Workflows is in maintenance mode with no new signups or subscriptions, and that all Workflows data, including credentials and OAuth tokens, will be permanently deleted by 30 April 2027. Pipedream Connect, the API, MCP servers and API proxy, is not affected and is where the company says its focus is going. We read that notice on 8 October 2026.

Who owns Pipedream?

+

Workday. Workday announced a definitive agreement to acquire Pipedream on 19 November 2025, and its fiscal 2026 results, published 24 February 2026, report the acquisition as closed. Workday describes Pipedream as an integration platform for AI agents with more than 3,000 pre-built connectors.

Is Pipedream still a good alternative to n8n?

+

Not for workflows. Pipedream is no longer accepting new Workflows customers, so it is not somewhere to move your n8n workflows. If you are a developer building an agent and need managed auth and prebuilt tools to call from code, Pipedream Connect is a different product and a strong one.

How does Pipedream's pricing compare to Tray.ai?

+

Pipedream publishes Connect pricing: a free plan for development, Startup at $99 a month billed annually or $150 monthly with 10,000 credits, then $0.012 a credit, and a custom Business plan. Credits meter compute, one per 30 seconds at 256MB. Tray.ai is enterprise / quote-based and does not publish list pricing, which is a point against us in any honest comparison.

Does Pipedream support MCP?

+

Yes, and well. Pipedream runs hosted MCP servers for more than 3,000 APIs, with each user's credentials stored separately and never exposed to the model. It is also building Conduit, a gateway with SSO, access policies, per-user permissions and an audit trail, which its site lists as early access. Tray.ai's Agent Gateway does the governing job today: per-tool and per-user policy in front of MCP, with every call logged. If governance is the requirement, check what Conduit includes once it is generally available.

Thinking about switching from Pipedream?

Get a demo of what life looks like on Tray.

Great — a couple more details

This helps us connect you with the right person. Optional, and you can skip it.

Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Integration Platform as a Service, Andrew Humphreys, Keith Guttridge, Allan Wilkins, Shrey Pasricha, 16 March 2026. Gartner, Emerging Market Quadrant for No-Code Agent Builders — Established Vendors, Jason Wong, Keith Guttridge, Eric Goodness, Kelli Smith, Justin Tung, 8 June 2026. Gartner, Hype Cycle for Agentic AI, Rajesh Kandaswamy, Leinar Ramos, Gary Olliffe, Tom Coshow, Pieter den Hamer, Erick Brethenoux, 2 April 2026. Nucleus Research, iPaaS Technology Value Matrix.

GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark, HYPE CYCLE and MAGIC QUADRANT are registered trademarks of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s Research & Advisory organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.