Legal and compliance integrations and automations
Subject requests, consent, attestation and vendor review, automated so the evidence exists before somebody asks for it.
The work is producing evidence before somebody asks for it, because the moment they ask is the moment it is too late to assemble. Subject requests have a statutory clock, attestation has to name a person and a version, and a vendor review that takes weeks gets routed around until there is no review at all. Speed is a compliance property here, not a convenience.
Built with Tray Headless
How to build data subject request automation
Search every system instead of the ones you remember, verify identity before disclosing, track the statutory clock, and record what was found.
Automation
How to build a consent and preference sync
Give consent one owner, propagate a withdrawal in seconds, keep the evidence, and never let a sync re-subscribe anybody.
Integration
How to build a contract lifecycle sync
Extract the obligations rather than storing a PDF, put renewal and notice dates where somebody will see them, and never let the signed version drift.
Integration
How to build vendor security review
Tier on what the vendor can reach, ask questions that match the tier, track conditions to closure, and re-review before the evidence expires.
Automation
How to build policy attestation tracking
Assign from the HRIS continuously, version what was accepted, chase without nagging everybody, and keep evidence a person can point at.
Automation
Guides for other teams
- Revenue operations (17)
- Finance (8)
- Customer success (5)
- People operations (6)
- IT and security (7)
- Marketing (3)
- Data operations (5)
- Platform engineering (4)
- AI operations (8)